Canada Gazette, Part I, Volume 157, Number 51: Criminal Interest Rate Regulations
December 23, 2023
Statutory authority
Criminal Code
Sponsoring department
Department of Justice
REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT
(This statement is not part of the Regulations.)
Issues
Predatory lenders take advantage of some of the most vulnerable people in our communities, including low-income Canadians, newcomers to Canada, and those with limited credit history — often by extending very high interest rate loans. The current criminal interest rate under the Criminal Code of 60% effective annual rate (equivalent to approximately 48% on an annualized percentage rate [APR] basis) can trap people in a cycle of debt that they cannot afford or escape.
The Budget Implementation Act, 2023, No. 1, amended section 347 of the Criminal Code to lower the criminal interest rate (also referred to as “the criminal rate”) to 35% APR. These amendments will come into force on a day or days to be fixed by order of the Governor in Council.
Setting a lower criminal rate under the Criminal Code may affect lending practices such as certain commercial loans as well as small-value collateralized loans, also known as pawn loans, both of which do not trap Canadians in a cycle of debt. Commercial loans do not trap Canadians in a cycle of debt, as they are extended to commercial entities, not individual Canadians. As pawn loans are collateralized, if consumers do not repay their debt, it is extinguished when their collateral is retained by the lender; therefore, the borrower cannot become trapped in a cycle of debt.
The criminal interest rate applies to all lending arrangements in Canada, except for certain payday loans (provided certain conditions set out in the Criminal Code are met) and tax rebate advances. Payday loans are defined in subsection 347.1(1) of the Criminal Code as an advancement of money in exchange for a post-dated cheque, a pre-authorized debit or a future payment of a similar nature. Subsection 347.1(2) specifies that payday loans must be less than $1,500, for a period of 62 days or less. Overdraft protection, margin loans, pawnbroking loans, lines of credit and credit cards are explicitly excluded from the definition of payday loans. Provinces must also receive a designation by the Governor in Council if they have enacted a payday lending regime, in accordance with subsection 347.1(3) of the Criminal Code. Designated provinces currently set various limits on the cost of borrowing for payday loans, meaning that consumers face varying cost of borrowing charges for payday loans depending on the province in which the loan is issued. These varying limits on the cost of borrowing can therefore disproportionately affect certain consumers depending upon the province in which they live.
The Criminal Interest Rate Regulations (the proposed Regulations) would exempt lending practices that fall outside of the government’s policy intent to crack down on predatory lending, from the criminal rate of interest. In addition, the proposed Regulations would impose a federal limit on the cost of borrowing for payday loans to harmonize the cost of payday loans across provinces that have been designated because they have enacted a payday loan regime.
Background
The Criminal Code makes it an offence to (1) enter into an agreement or arrangement to receive interest at a rate exceeding 60% effective annual rate (EAR); and (2) receive interest at a rate exceeding 60% EAR. The criminal interest rate was first introduced in section 347 of the Criminal Code in 1980. The amendments introduced as part of the Budget Implementation Act, 2023, No. 1 represent the first significant update to the criminal interest rate regime since 1980. The criminal rate is applicable to virtually all credit agreements and arrangements in Canada, including instalment loans, lines of credit, auto loans, auto title loans, credit cards, and more. The criminal interest rate provisions do not apply to transactions under the Tax Rebate Discounting Act and certain payday loan agreements. This latter exception was enacted through amendments included in former Bill C-26, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (criminal interest rate) [S.C. 2007, c. 9] in 2007.
When prosecuting the offence, the Crown must elect, based on the circumstances, either to proceed by indictment (i.e. an indictable offence that carries more serious consequences) or by way of summary conviction (i.e. less serious). The penalties for section 347 of the Criminal Code are imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, on indictment, or a fine of not more than $25,000 or imprisonment for a term of not more than to two years less a day, or both, in the case of summary conviction proceedings.
Payday loan exemption
In 2007, section 347 of the Criminal Code was amended to provide an exemption from the application of the criminal rate provisions for payday loans, provided certain conditions are met [i.e. the loan is $1,500 or less for a term of 62 days or less, is issued by a licensed lender or someone who is specifically authorized by the laws of a province, and the province is designated by the Governor in Council in accordance with subsection 347.1(3)]. In order to receive this designation, a province must have in place legislative measures that protect payday loan users and must provide for limits on the total cost of borrowing for payday loan agreements. Currently, nine provinces (the exception being Quebec) have an approved payday loan regime. The territories and Quebec have not sought designation under these provisions and, therefore, any payday loan offerings in the territories and Quebec would be subject to the criminal rate.
Each province’s payday loan regime is different, although most provincial regimes include common consumer protection measures such as disclosure requirements, cancellation rights, and restrictions on wage assignments or loan rollovers. Currently, provincial authorities set a limit on the cost of borrowing for a payday loan, which can range between $14 per $100 borrowed (Newfoundland and Labrador) and $17 per $100 borrowed (Manitoba, Nova Scotia and Saskatchewan).
Currently, provincial payday loan regimes also allow for a one-time dishonoured cheque fee of $20 in British Columbia, Manitoba, New Brunswick, and Newfoundland and Labrador, $25 in Alberta, Ontario, and Saskatchewan and $40 in Nova Scotia, while Prince Edward Island does not impose a numerical limit on the dishonoured cheque fee that may be charged. A dishonoured cheque fee is imposed by a payday lender on a borrower when there are insufficient funds in a borrower’s bank account to cover repayment of the payday loan.
Government initiatives to crack down on predatory lending
In 2021, the Minister of Finance’s mandate letter included a commitment to crack down on predatory lenders by lowering the criminal interest rate in the Criminal Code. In addition, this commitment was highlighted in Budget 2021. For the purposes of this analysis, predatory loans are considered to be credit products with high interest rates and/or fees. These products are generally provided by alternative lenders (e.g. lenders other than banks or credit unions).
Budget 2023 announced the Government’s intention to lower the criminal interest rate to 35% APR (from 60% EAR, which is equivalent to an APR of approximately 48%) and set the maximum cost of borrowing for payday loans at $14 per $100 borrowed. Consequently, the Budget Implementation Act, 2023, No. 1 introduced legislative amendments to lower the criminal interest rate to 35% APR. The amendments also included two regulation-making authorities to (1) provide exemptions for certain types of loans from the criminal rate; and (2) fix a limit on the total cost of borrowing for a payday loan agreement. These provisions received royal assent with the passage of the Budget Implementation Act, 2023, No. 1 but are not yet in force.
On October 6, 2023, the Department of Finance (the Department) launched consultations to explore further lowering the criminal interest rate, increasing access to low-cost, small-value credit in Canada, and additional revisions to the payday lending exemption. Feedback received as part of those consultations will be addressed separately from feedback on the proposed Regulations.
Objective
The objectives of the proposed Criminal Interest Rate Regulations are to
- Exempt certain types of loans from the criminal interest rate where the loan types would not lead to predatory lending practices; and
- Limit the cost of borrowing of a payday loan at $14 per $100 borrowed and limit the amount that can be charged by payday lenders for a dishonoured cheque fee.
Description
Exemptions to the criminal interest rate
The proposed Regulations would exempt commercial loans (i.e. loans for business purposes when the borrower is not a natural person) valued above $10,000 and up to $500,000 from the criminal interest rate (which, under the amendments in the Budget Implementation Act 2023, No. 1, will decrease to 35% APR), so long as the APR on these loans does not exceed 48%. Commercial loans above $500,000 would not be subject to the criminal interest rate, or any other rate cap, under the proposed Regulations. Commercial loans of $10,000 and below would be subject to the criminal interest rate, which under the amendments in the Budget Implementation Act, 2023, No. 1 will decrease to 35% APR.
The proposed Regulations would exempt small dollar, non-recourse collateralized loans, commonly referred to as pawn loans from the criminal interest rate, so long as the APR on these loans does not exceed 48% and the loan is valued at less than $1,000. Pawn loans valued at $1,000 and above would remain subject to the criminal interest rate, which under the amendments in the Budget Implementation Act, 2023, No. 1 will decrease to 35% APR.
Limit on the cost of borrowing for a payday loan
The proposed Regulations would impose a new federal limit on the cost of borrowing for payday loans of $14 per $100 borrowed in all provinces that have an approved payday loan regime. Lenders in provinces that currently have higher limits on the cost of borrowing would need to lend at the $14 per $100 rate to comply with the Criminal Code. In cases in which the payday loan is paid back in two weeks, this would result in an APR of over 350%.
The proposed Regulations would also exclude dishonoured cheque fees of $20 or less from the calculation of the $14 rate limit. This would effectively set a cap of $20 on the one-time dishonoured cheque fee that a payday lender could charge, in line with the lowest provincial allowable fee. Lenders in provinces that currently allow for higher dishonoured cheque fees would need to lower their dishonoured cheque fees to $20 to comply with the Criminal Code.
The proposed Regulations would not include interest on outstanding loan amounts in the $14 limit, as almost all provincial regimes currently allow for interest on outstanding loan amounts of up to 2.5% per month.
The proposed Regulations will apply to all loans, including payday loans, entered into on or after the date on which the Regulations come into force.
Regulatory development
Consultation
In fall 2022, the Department of Finance (the Department) conducted a 60-day public consultation on lowering the criminal interest rate to curb predatory lending. The Department received more than 100 submissions through this consultation from industry associations, consumer groups, academics, and individual Canadians.
The focus of this consultation was to seek views on the criminal interest rate set out in the Criminal Code. However, the Department also heard from stakeholders that exemptions to the criminal interest rate should be provided for certain types of loans (i.e. loans where the borrower is a commercial entity) and that more action should be taken to protect borrowers from payday loans.
Following the Budget 2023 announcement to lower the criminal interest rate and introduce a cap on the cost of borrowing for payday lending, the Department held targeted consultations with select stakeholders to inform regulatory drafting on the exemptions to the criminal interest rate and the payday lending cap. The Department received over 50 submissions and initiated follow-up meetings with stakeholders to further discuss their submissions.
Consumer groups generally opposed any exemptions for consumer-related products. Some highlighted that exemptions for commercial loans may hurt small business owners as they may not have the acumen to avoid predatory lending. However, no small business organization made a submission. Others offered no views on an exemption for commercial borrowers.
Industry lenders proposed a number of potential exemptions. A variety of industry stakeholders, lenders and borrowers alike argued that, in the absence of a regulatory exemption for commercial loans, some businesses may be prevented from securing necessary credit. Industry borrowers argued for an exemption for commercial loans on the basis that this would ensure sophisticated business transactions are not constrained, including in the ability for some business borrowers to access debt financing.
Some industry lenders proposed an exemption for small dollar loans that could potentially serve as an alternative to payday loans, while allowing for more manageable payment schedules. However, consumer groups have indicated their opposition to such an exemption, citing the possibility that borrowers may still fall into a cycle of debt.
Pawnbrokers argued that small dollar secured loans do not trap borrowers in a cycle of debt the same way that unsecured personal loans do and should therefore be exempt from the criminal rate. They also commented that due to the small-value nature of these loans in combination with high fixed costs, pawn loans would become unviable under a lower criminal rate.
Provincial regulators highlighted that, in addition to a limit on the cost of borrowing of a payday loan, many provinces allow a one-time dishonoured cheque fee, as well as interest on outstanding principal. Provinces and payday lenders are of the view that these fees should continue to be allowed under the proposed Regulations.
Modern treaty obligations and Indigenous engagement and consultation
Indigenous peoples may be positively impacted by this proposal. Data from the 2019 Canadian Financial Capabilities Survey indicates that respondents who self-identify as Indigenous were generally more likely to have borrowed using a payday loan over the past 12 months of the survey period, particularly for the low-income households. For that year, the group that self-identified as Indigenous accessed payday loans at a higher rate than the average, with 5% of Indigenous respondents accessing payday loans compared to 1.3% of non-Indigenous. Therefore, given Indigenous peoples are more likely to access payday loans, they would benefit from a lower cost of borrowing of $14 per $100 fixed by the proposed Regulations.
The proposal is not expected to impact potential or established Aboriginal or treaty rights, which are recognized and affirmed under section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982.
Instrument choice
The criminal interest rate is set out in the Criminal Code. Once the changes enacted in the Budget Implementation Act, 2023, No. 1 are in force, the Criminal Code will also authorize the Governor in Council to make regulations providing for exemptions to the application of this rate. Regulations are the only viable instrument to provide for such exemptions, as a result, no other instrument was considered.
Regulatory analysis
Benefits and costs
The complete cost-benefit analysis developed to support this proposal is available upon request. The analysis is summarized below.
Exemptions to the criminal interest rate
Commercial lending does not require the same degree of regulatory oversight as personal loans. Often commercial loans require high rates of return to attract capital investments and are usually undertaken by parties that understand risk versus return trade-offs occurring as a part of diversified portfolios designed to hedge risks. Overly restrictive rules on these types of loans could have a cooling effect on transactions that, all factors considered, would be beneficial to both parties and the economy.
Moreover, commercial loans do not trap individuals in Canada in a cycle of debt. In addition to capturing certain commercial lending practices that are outside the policy intent, further lowering the criminal rate could restrict the ability of sophisticated commercial entities to engage in borrowing transactions. This is why the proposed Regulations would exempt commercial loans from the new lower criminal rate.
Specifically, the proposed Regulations would exempt commercial loans valued between $10,000 and $500,000 from the criminal interest rate, which, under the amendments in the Budget Implementation Act, 2023, No. 1, will decrease to 35% APR, but would be maintaining the 48% APR limit. This effectively ensures that some business borrowers, particularly small business borrowers, continue to benefit from a certain level of criminal protection, while being able to access credit that would not be provided at an interest rate of less than 35% APR.
Commercial loans valued below $10,000 will not be exempted from the new criminal rate of 35% APR under the proposed Regulations. Very few commercial loans are issued for values below $10,000 and such loans are less likely to be a part of a larger diversified investment portfolio. Therefore, commercial loans below $10,000 will be subject to the new criminal interest rate to disincentivize lenders from manipulating regulatory exemptions and circumventing the criminal rate by issuing consumer loans as commercial loans. Because few commercial loans are valued below $10,000, this will have a very minimal cost impact on lenders and commercial borrowers. In general, consumer borrowers will benefit from the reduced risk of lenders attempting to circumvent the new criminal rate.
Commercial loans valued above $500,000 will face no criminal interest rate. This is to avoid contractual frictions and ensure healthy and productive investments in areas of venture capital and private equity, which may currently be limited with a criminal rate of 48% APR. Commercial lending transactions above $500,000 represent a level of sophistication that does not require protection through the criminal interest rate provisions. Further, there are very few commercial transactions for loans above $500,000 at values approaching an interest rate of 48%, so costs to lenders and borrowers are limited. Exempting commercial loans above $500,000 from the criminal rate will present benefits to some limited forms of sophisticated transactions, such as venture capital financing and automotive floor financing. These types of transactions do not affect low income and economically vulnerable Canadians.
Small dollar, non-recourse, collateralized loans, commonly referred to as pawn loans, are different from other types of borrowing, as obtaining such a loan does not depend on a borrowers’ income or credit. Pawn loans are secured by collateral. If the loan is repaid, the collateral is returned to the borrower. If the loan is not repaid, the lender retains the collateral, covering any outstanding obligation and protecting the borrower from a debt that they might not be able to service, which is one of the primary policy objectives of the new, lower criminal rate. Therefore, these loans do not cause the same level of harm as other loans in that a cycle of debt is not created or perpetuated and a default on these loans does not affect borrowers’ credit scores or ability to secure other borrowing. Given the relatively lower degree of harm, the proposed Regulations would therefore aim to maintain access to this small-value collateralized lending product.
Pawn loans valued at or above $1,000 will continue to be subject to the criminal interest rate, which is decreasing to 35% APR, so as not to incentivize lenders to manipulate regulatory exemptions and circumvent the criminal interest rate to issue consumer loans. For example, absent this threshold, alternative lenders that offer high-cost instalment loans may be incentivized to obtain pawn licences to offer high-value “collateralized” loans. It should be noted that very few pawn loans are issued for values above $1,000.
As the exemptions provided by the proposed Regulations would remove restrictions and be permissive in nature, it is assumed that impacted individuals and businesses generally behave rationally and only undertake such exchanges in situations they deem to be in their best interest. As the pawn exemption will largely maintain the status quo by subjecting the majority of pawn loans to the current criminal rate, there are no monetized costs and benefits to those elements of the proposal. Similarly, the status quo is largely maintained for commercial loans below $500,000 (in terms of the applicable maximum rate of interest). While there may be some positive monetary benefits for commercial loans above $500,000 that are no longer subject to a rate limit, due to the variability in the number and value of loans issued, those impacts are not monetized.
Limit on the cost of borrowing for payday loans
Some stakeholders have advised that lowering the criminal interest rate, with no action to reduce the cost of borrowing for payday loans, could increasingly push consumers toward payday loans. As the limit on the cost of borrowing for a payday loan varies by province, the proposed Regulations would impose a federal limit to qualify for the exemption, which would harmonize payday lending costs across provinces that allow for payday loans, aligning it with the lowest provincial limit on the cost of borrowing for a payday loan, in Newfoundland and Labrador.
The following model quantifies the costs and benefits of the federal limit on the cost of borrowing of a payday loan. The model assesses two scenarios: In the baseline, over a 10-year period, maximum rate caps (including rate caps on dishonoured cheque fees) are determined by the provinces and are assumed to be maintained at current levels. In the regulatory scenario, over the same 10-year period, a federal maximum limit on the cost of borrowing for a payday loan of $14 per every $100 applies in relevant jurisdictions, as well as a maximum dishonoured cheque fee of $20. The incremental impacts of the proposed Regulations are measured as the difference between these two scenarios.
Provincial payday loan data from Alberta, British Columbia, and Nova Scotia are available over various years. Data from 2021, the most recent year for which data are available for all three provinces, are used for estimating costs and benefits. All dollar values presented in this analysis are expressed in 2022 dollars. Currently, there is variability in provincial limits on the cost of borrowing, expressed as the maximum cost of borrowing for a $100 payday loan:
- $17 in Nova Scotia, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan;
- $15 in Ontario, Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick, Alberta, and British Columbia; and
- $14 in Newfoundland and Labrador.
To simplify the analysis, the population weighted average of the allowable maximum charge per $100 is used. This works out to $15.25 per $100 in the baseline and $14 per $100 under the proposed Regulations.
Furthermore, there is currently variability in the provincial limits for the maximum allowable dishonoured cheque fee charged by payday loan providers. They are as follows:
- $40 in Nova Scotia;
- $25 in Alberta, Ontario, and Saskatchewan;
- $20 in British Columbia, Manitoba, New Brunswick, and Newfoundland and Labrador; and
- Unspecified in Prince Edward Island.
As with loan costs, the population weighted average of the allowable dishonoured cheque fee is used to simplify the potential impact. It is assumed that the average maximum in Prince Edward Island is $25 (discussed below). Therefore, the national population weighted average allowable charge would go from $24.24 in the baseline to $20 under the proposed Regulations.
The additional following assumptions are made:
- There are no payday loans offered in provinces and territories if they have not received a payday loan exemption designation from the Governor in Council. Therefore, Quebec and the territories are thus excluded from the analysis.
- Payday loan usage is proportional to the population of the province. Due to the lack of data on payday loans in certain provinces, provincial population data is assumed to be the most accurate method for estimating the value of payday loans and the number of payday loan customers in a particular province.
- The volume (in dollars) of loans is a function of the price elasticity of supply. This assumes that if the maximum rate that can be charged for a payday loan declines, the supply of payday loans will decline as a result. This assumption is in line with the economic theory of price elasticity of supply. This elasticity is estimated using a decrease in the number of storefronts in Ontario, following several rate changes in the province (from $21 to $15 per $100 loan).
- The volume of loans is assumed to grow at a real (over and above inflation) rate of 2% under both the baseline and regulatory scenarios.
- Supply and demand of payday loans would not be impacted by the lowering of allowable charges for insufficient funds. This assumption is based on the belief that charges for insufficient funds on cheques to cover payday loan liabilities are used as a tool by lenders to incent borrowers to ensure sufficient balances are available in their accounts. The proposed $20 limit is deemed adequate to achieve this objective and thus no change in borrower behaviour is modelled and rates of default loans would not increase. In addition, lenders are not assumed to view these charges as a reliable source of revenue within their business model and thus would be unlikely to restrict supply of loans in response.
- All loans in default are due to dishonoured cheques or a dishonoured debit. The proposed Regulations cap the amount a payday lender may charge a borrower for a dishonoured instrument to $20. This limits the charges that are permitted in provinces such as Alberta, Ontario, and Saskatchewan. In order to estimate the impacts of this change, this assumption is required.
- The average dishonoured cheque fee in Prince Edward Island is $25. While it could potentially be higher, the payday lending market in the province is very small relative to that of the rest of the country and, therefore, any dishonoured cheque fee amount would result in very little incremental impacts and little impact on the results of the nationwide analysis.
- There is a 5% increase in the average number of loans taken on by a borrower. This assumption is based on academic reports that estimate that the number of payday loans per borrower increases when the maximum interest rate on payday loans is decreased. This is likely a result of payday lenders issuing loans to existing borrowers that have a positive repayment history and an established relationship with the lender.
- Payday loan users are charged the maximum allowable interest in their province. This assumption is based on feedback from a number of consumer groups and industry members.
- All operating expenses carried by the lender remain the same in both scenarios. Bad debt expenses remain at the same proportion of revenue in both scenarios. This assumes that lenders have some control over bad debt and other expenses in the short run, while operating expenses are fixed.
- Industry will bear a one-time cost with these regulatory changes, for the purposes of updating its operations (updating IT systems, marketing materials, etc.). The estimate of these costs is provided by industry and is assumed to be accurate.
The variables investigated for the purposes of this cost-benefit analysis include changes in profits for firms, and estimated savings to borrowers. All dollar values are expressed in 2022 dollars.
To calculate the costs of this proposal, the loss in producers’ surplus is estimated, using a cost breakdown supplied by industry. The cost of the proposed Regulations is estimated as the difference between the estimated industry profit in the baseline scenario as a function of total loans issued and the estimated industry profit in the regulatory scenario.
To estimate the benefits to payday loan borrowers, the differential in the cost of borrowing is applied to the total value of loans that continue to be issued in the regulatory scenario. On average, consumers will save $1.25 for every $100 on payday loans. Since the estimated value of interest paid declines in the regulatory scenario, it can be concluded that the proposed Regulations would provide cost savings to consumers that are able to borrow money in both the baseline and regulatory scenario (remaining customers).
As described in the tables below, Canadian borrowers are collectively saving approximately $29.3 million in interest on payday loans, as well as on dishonoured cheque fees, in the first year and $256.8 million over 10 years. This results in cost savings of about $51.90 per customer for all remaining customers, in the first year. Savings to borrowers are expected to come at a cost to industry profits, which are expected to decline by $30.7 million in the first year and $238.5 million over 10 years. This results in a net present value benefit to society of $18.2 million ($256.8 million minus $238.5 million).
Cost-benefit statement
- Number of years: 11 years (2024–2034)
- Base year for costing: 2022
- Present value base year: 2024
- Discount rate: 7%
| Impacted stakeholder | Description of cost | Base year (in $M) |
Other relevant years | Final year (in $M) |
Total (present value) |
Annualized value (in $M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Ongoing loss in profits | $26.8 | N/A | $32.7 | $234.6 | $31.8 |
| One-time cost (updating IT systems, marketing materials, etc.) | $3.92 | N/A | $0 | $3.92 | N/A | |
| All stakeholders | Total costs | $30.7 | N/A | $32.7 | $238.5 | $31.8 |
| Impacted stakeholder | Description of benefit | Base year (in $M) |
Other relevant years | Final year (in $M) |
Total (present value) |
Annualized value (in $M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumers | Savings on loan fees | $27.46 | N/A | $33.5 | $240.5 | $32.1 |
| Savings on dishonoured cheque charges | $1.86 | N/A | $2.27 | $16.3 | $2.2 | |
| All stakeholders | Total benefits | $29.3 | N/A | $35.7 | $256.8 | $34.2 |
| Impacts | Base year | Other relevant years | Final year | Total (present value) |
Annualized value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total costs | $30.7 | N/A | $32.7 | $238.5 | $31.8 |
| Total benefits | $29.3 | N/A | $35.7 | $256.8 | $34.2 |
| NET IMPACT | ($1.4) | N/A | $3.1 | $18.2 | $2.4 |
Quantified (non-$) and qualitative impacts
Positive impacts
- Modelled results indicate that the number of payday loan borrowers would decrease by over 44 000 Canadians. For some borrowers, this would lower the risk of them falling into a cycle of debt. Canadians that are likely to benefit from this change would either seek out other sources of lower-cost debt or delay discretionary spending until they are able to pay for the product or service using savings. While it could be argued that individuals would only borrow money if they determine it to be in their best interest, associated late charges and interest means that many customers underestimate the overall cost of the loan.
Negative impacts
- Under the model examined, results indicated the number of loans issued decreased by close to 93 000 loans in the first year. This means that some subprime borrowers may be unable to access credit from payday lenders. The resulting reduction in loans would have a variety of outcomes. As mentioned, for some, this would be beneficial. However, for others, a lowered supply of loans could result in additional costs such as incurring consequences for late payments on other financial obligations such as utilities. If the late payment results in disconnection of service, reconnection charges could be significant. This could also result in additional non-sufficient funds fees from banks. In extreme cases, borrowers may seek out black-market lenders (loan sharks). Loan sharks charge rates above criminal limits and may use threats and/or violence to incent repayment.
- Lender profits decrease by over 50%, or over $26 million in the first year. In addition to the lowered profits, consolidation of the industry could also be an impact of the proposed Regulations. In the long run, there may be fewer companies offering payday loans and each company could limit the number of outlets in operation, limiting overhead costs. This may also drive an increase in payday loans offered exclusively through low-cost online providers. This restricted access could increase search costs for customers, offsetting savings from lowered interest rates.
Sensitivity analysis
To examine the impacts of different variables on the outcomes of the proposed Regulations, a sensitivity analysis was conducted on the price elasticity of supply (scenarios 1 and 2).
Scenario 1
In scenario 1, results were estimated assuming an increased price elasticity of supply of 0.41, compared to 0.31 in the regulatory (central) analysis. This ensures that the results are robust to variations in this assumption, which is uncertain given the limited data on which it was based. Since industry members have suggested that a rate cap will result in a decrease in payday loans, an increase in elasticity was considered a possibility. With the increased elasticity in supply, there would be a greater restriction of supply resulting from the decreased loan rates and total volume of loans supplied under the regulations would drop from $2.2 billion to $2.18 billion in the first year. As a result of this change, consumers are expected to save an average of $52.10 with benefits totalling $29.1 million in the first year.
In the first year, lenders would also see a slight decrease in profits from $26.2 million in the central scenario to $24.3 million in scenario 1. This represents a profit loss of $28.7 million from the baseline scenario when taking into account one-time costs.
Overall, the net present value of the proposed Regulations in scenario 1 is $353,000, a large decrease from the estimated net present value in the central scenario of $18.2 million.
Scenario 2
In scenario 2, it is assumed that price elasticity of supply is equal to 0.21, a decrease from what is estimated in the central scenario. This will allow for the estimation of costs and benefits in the event that supply is not as responsive to a change in price. In scenario 2, the total loan volume disbursed in the first year is estimated to be $2.22 billion, a slight increase from what is estimated in the central scenario ($2.20 billion). In this scenario, consumers are expected to save $51.80 each, totalling $29.5 million in the first year.
Additionally, as a result of a change in total loan volumes, lender profits are estimated to decline by $24.9 million (in the first year) from the baseline scenario. This is a smaller decrease than what is estimated in the central scenario of $26.8 million. This represents a profit loss of $28.8 from the baseline scenario when taking into account one-time costs.
Overall, the net present value impact of the proposed Regulations in scenario 2 is $36.2 million, a large increase from the net present value of the central scenario ($18.2 million) and scenario 1 ($353,000).
The results in scenarios 1 and 2 imply that the model is very sensitive to the uncertainty inherent in the price elasticity of supply. This demonstrates that the true impacts of the proposed Regulations are largely dependent on the market response.
| Impacts | Central scenario | Scenario 1 | Scenario 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total costs | $30.7 | $32.6 | $28.8 |
| Total benefits | $29.3 | $29.1 | $29.5 |
| Net impact | ($1.4) | ($3.4) | $0.67 |
| Net present value (over 10 years) | $18.2 | $0.35 | $36.2 |
Distributional analysis
In general, payday loan borrowers often have lower income and less savings. The Financial Consumer Agency of Canada (FCAC) 2016 study of payday loan borrowers in Canada found that 53% of payday borrowers earned less than $55,000 annually. Additionally, 62% of respondents reported that their savings would cover less than three months of expenses. Only 24% reported they would be able to pay for an unexpected purchase of $500 with their existing savings.
Based on publicly available provincial data, it is estimated that there were over 600,000 payday borrowers in Canada in 2021. The FCAC estimates that by September 2022, 4.52% of Canadians had used a payday loan in their lifetime to manage daily expenses. Indigenous peoples, recent immigrants, Canadians with low income, and women are over-represented in these results.
Payday borrowers are often working age and living in an urban area. The FCAC reports 72% of payday loan borrowers were between 25 and 54 years of age and 83% live in an urban area.
Although payday loan users borrow for a number of reasons, most borrow to cover necessary expenses. For instance, the FCAC 2016 report found that 45% of respondents used a payday loan for a necessary and unexpected expense while 41% borrowed for a necessary but expected expense. Only 7% of respondents reported using the loan to “buy something special.” As to why borrowers use payday loans instead of cheaper credit alternatives, many reported being unable to access these alternatives.
Based on this research, the Department estimates that low-income individuals between the ages of 25 and 54 will disproportionately benefit from the proposed Regulations, as most will be able to continue borrowing but at a lower cost. Indigenous peoples, recent immigrants, individuals with low income, and women are likely to benefit from the proposed Regulations to the extent that they use payday loans. These groups are expected to benefit the most from the proposed Regulations.
Of the borrowers who will lose access to payday loans, it is expected some of these individuals will benefit, such as through finding a cheaper source of credit or from foregoing credit entirely, thereby saving on interest payments. Survey reports find that when denied credit from alternative lenders, some consumers turn to family, friends, or community organizations to borrow funds. These borrowing options may sometimes be less risky to consumers as they are less likely to lead the consumer into a cycle of debt.
However, some consumers who are denied a payday loan experience harm, such as missing a bill payment or foregoing a necessary expense. If unable to find alternative forms of credit, these borrowers may face late payment fees or other negative outcomes as a result of losing access to payday loans. Some borrowers may even seek out illegal loans.
Small business lens
Analysis under the small business lens concluded that the proposed Regulations would impact small businesses.
In terms of the proposed exemptions to the criminal interest rate for commercial loans, the proposed Regulations do not apply the new criminal rate to loans greater than $10,000 and exempt loans greater than $500,000 from application of any maximum interest rate. These exemptions would be permissive in nature and facilitate businesses operating in a similar manner as before the decrease in the criminal rate. This would aid small businesses in their ability to attract capital investment for high-risk endeavours by offering high rates of return, allowing them to grow quicker and hedge personal risk by sharing it with potential lenders.
Most pawn lenders are small businesses. As with exempted commercial loans, proposed exemptions would allow them to operate in a manner similar to the status quo. In this sense, the proposed Regulations are beneficial to small businesses and would allow them to offer loans of less than $1,000 that are secured by collateral at higher rates than in the baseline.
In terms of the proposal to cap payday loans at $14 per 100 borrowed, some payday lenders may be classified as small businesses, and as such would be impacted by the proposed Regulations. We expect that by imposing a rate cap on payday loans, the industry may shrink and may force some lenders out of business. There is evidence to suggest that decreasing the maximum rate cap can lead to decreased numbers of payday lending outlets. Therefore, there may be decreased competition in the payday loan market as larger companies gain market share. The new limit on the cost of borrowing for a payday loan may create compliance costs for lenders, such as adjusting IT systems, signage, and marketing to borrowers. Lenders estimate that this fixed cost will total $3.9 million nationally. Due to data limitations, it is unclear what portion of payday lenders issuing payday loans are small businesses. According to a 2016 Cardus report, 35% of payday lenders are small businesses. From available provincial data, the Department estimates that there are over 1 000 payday lenders in Canada. Taking the lower bound of this estimate (1 000) the following impacts to small businesses are below.
Given the main objective of these proposed Regulations of providing protection to Canadian borrowers from excessive charges for loans, flexible compliance options were not considered viable for this proposal.
Small business lens summary
- Number of small businesses impacted: 350
- Number of years: 10 (2023–2032)
- Base year for costing: 2022
- Present value base year: 2023
- Discount rate: 7%
| Totals | Annualized value (in $M) | Present value (in $M) |
|---|---|---|
| Total cost (all impacted small businesses) | $11.1 | $83.5 |
| Cost per impacted small business | $0.03 | $0.24 |
One-for-one rule
The one-for-one rule does not apply, as there is no incremental change in the administrative burden on business and no regulatory titles are repealed. The proposed Regulations do not impose any additional administrative burden on businesses, as there is no requirement to prove an entity is eligible for exemption to the criminal interest rate. Similarly, there is no requirement for entities to prove to a federal regulator that their payday loan offerings are below the cap. Businesses, at their own discretion, may choose to maintain records as proof of innocence in the event of a case of criminal proceedings. Therefore, the one-for-one rule does not apply.
Regulatory cooperation and alignment
The Department has conducted, and commissioned, research into the regulatory environment of international jurisdictions. Specific international jurisdictions that have been researched include the United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, and the United States (U.S.) in terms of maximum costs of borrowing, and exemptions thereto. This proposal aligns to some extent with the exemptions to interest rate caps in those jurisdictions. For example, commercial loans are exempted from interest rate caps in many U.S. states, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia, and New Zealand. Pawn loans are exempted from maximum interest rate caps in Australia, as well as some U.S. states. Further, the Department has consulted with provincial partners with existing payday lending regimes to ensure that the federal approach to cap payday lending aligns with provincial legislative regimes.
Strategic environmental assessment
In accordance with the Cabinet Directive on the Environmental Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals, a preliminary scan concluded that a strategic environmental assessment is not required.
Gender-based analysis plus
Based on the June 2022 Seymour Financial Resilience Index, approximately 13% of Canadians took out an instalment loan, and 4% took out a payday loan in 2022. FCAC data demonstrates that Indigenous peoples, recent immigrants, Canadians with low income, and women are overrepresented in the percentage of Canadians that have used an online or payday lender. Users of payday loans generally have lower income and may be experiencing poverty.
These groups would benefit from this measure to the extent that they rely on payday loans. In addition, any individual in Canada that relies on payday loans will benefit from the proposed Regulations. However, a small proportion of potential borrowers who lose access to credit may experience some harm as a result of the proposed Regulations. Some of these harms may include exclusion from this market and potentially turning to illegal lending.
Implementation, compliance and enforcement, and service standards
Implementation
The proposed Regulations would come into force three months following publication of the final Regulations in the Canada Gazette, Part II, and would align with the coming into force of the amendments to the Criminal Code to lower the criminal rate of interest. This three-month period would allow lenders to adjust their operations, including IT systems, signage, and marketing to align with the requirements.
Compliance and enforcement
The criminal interest rate has been and will continue to be enforced under the Criminal Code, and the exemptions to the criminal interest rate in the proposed Regulations will also be enforced by provincial police forces. Lenders in breach of the criminal rate, and the non-payday exemptions thereof, are at risk of prosecution.
In designated provinces with a payday lending regime and existing limits on the cost of borrowing for payday loans, the new federal limit on the cost of a payday loan will continue to be enforced by the appropriate provincial regulator. Because relevant provincial regulators already enforce provincially set limits on the cost of borrowing for payday loans and other consumer protection measures related to payday loans, it is expected that they will be able to implement the new federal limit within the three-month transition period. No new funding will be required to support provincial regulators with implementation.
Contact
The contact person for public enquiries is Mark Radley, through the following:
consultationconsumeraffairs.consultationconsommation@fin.gc.ca
Or
Department of Justice
General enquiries
Telephone: 613‑957‑4222
Email: webadmin@justice.gc.ca
PROPOSED REGULATORY TEXT
Notice is given that the Governor in Council proposes to make the annexed Criminal Interest Rate Regulations under subsections 347.01(2)footnote a and 347.1(2.1)footnote b of the Criminal Code footnote c.
Interested persons may make representations concerning the proposed Regulations within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. They are strongly encouraged to use the online commenting feature that is available on the Canada Gazette website but if they use email, mail or any other means, the representations should cite the Canada Gazette, Part I, and the date of publication of this notice, and be sent to Judith Hamel, Director General, Financial Services Division, Financial Sector Policy Branch, Department of Finance, 90 Elgin Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G5 (email: consultationconsumeraffairs.consultationconsommation@fin.gc.ca).
Ottawa, December 14, 2023
Wendy Nixon
Assistant Clerk of the Privy Council
Criminal Interest Rate Regulations
Non-Application to Certain Loans for Business or Commercial Purposes
Criteria
1 For the purposes of subsection 347.01(1) of the Criminal Code, section 347 of that Act does not apply in respect of an agreement or arrangement that meets the following criteria:
- (a) the borrower is not a natural person;
- (b) the borrower has entered into the agreement or arrangement for business or commercial purposes; and
- (c) either
- (i) the amount of the credit advanced under the agreement or arrangement is more than $10,000 but less than or equal to $500,000 and the annual percentage rate of interest does not exceed 48% on the credit advanced, or
- (ii) the amount of the credit advanced under the agreement or arrangement is more than $500,000.
Non-Application to Certain Pawnbroking Loans
Criteria
2 For the purposes of subsection 347.01(1) of the Criminal Code, section 347 of that Act does not apply in respect of an agreement or arrangement that meets the following criteria:
- (a) the person who receives interest under the agreement or arrangement is a person who carries on a business related to pawnbroking;
- (b) the borrower has pawned tangible personal property or corporeal movable property, other than a vehicle, in exchange for the advancement of credit under the agreement or arrangement;
- (c) in the event of the borrower’s default under the terms of the agreement or arrangement, the only recourse of the person referred to in paragraph (a) is the seizure of the pawned property; and
- (d) the amount of the credit advanced under the agreement or arrangement is less than $1,000 and the annual percentage rate of interest does not exceed 48% on the credit advanced.
Limit Relating to Payday Loans
Limit on total cost of borrowing
3 (1) For the purposes of paragraph 347.1(2)(a.1) of the Criminal Code, the limit on the total cost of borrowing under a payday loan agreement is 14% of the amount of money advanced to the borrower under the agreement.
Clarification
(2) In determining whether a payday loan agreement complies with the limit under subsection (1), the total cost of borrowing does not include a fee, fine, penalty or other charge that is specifically authorized under the applicable provincial law and imposed on the borrower
- (a) for default of payment; or
- (b) for providing a dishonoured cheque or other dishonoured instrument, if the amount of the fee, fine, penalty or other charge is $20 or less.
Definition of applicable provincial law
(3) In subsection (2), applicable provincial law means the legislative measures that are referred to in subsection 347.1(3) of the Criminal Code and that apply in the province in which the payday loan agreement is entered into.
Coming into Force
S.C. 2023, c. 26
4 These Regulations come into force on the first day on which sections 610 to 612 of the Budget Implementation Act, 2023, No. 1 are all in force, but if these Regulations are registered after that day, they come into force on the day on which they are registered.
Terms of use and Privacy notice
Terms of use
It is your responsibility to ensure that the comments you provide do not:
- contain personal information
- contain protected or classified information of the Government of Canada
- express or incite discrimination on the basis of race, sex, religion, sexual orientation or against any other group protected under the Canadian Human Rights Act or the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
- contain hateful, defamatory, or obscene language
- contain threatening, violent, intimidating or harassing language
- contain language contrary to any federal, provincial or territorial laws of Canada
- constitute impersonation, advertising or spam
- encourage or incite any criminal activity
- contain external links
- contain a language other than English or French
- otherwise violate this notice
The federal institution managing the proposed regulatory change retains the right to review and remove personal information, hate speech, or other information deemed inappropriate for public posting as listed above.
Confidential Business Information should only be posted in the specific Confidential Business Information text box. In general, Confidential Business Information includes information that (i) is not publicly available, (ii) is treated in a confidential manner by the person to whose business the information relates, and (iii) has actual or potential economic value to the person or their competitors because it is not publicly available and whose disclosure would result in financial loss to the person or a material gain to their competitors. Comments that you provide in the Confidential Business Information section that satisfy this description will not be made publicly available. The federal institution managing the proposed regulatory change retains the right to post the comment publicly if it is not deemed to be Confidential Business Information.
Your comments will be posted on the Canada Gazette website for public review. However, you have the right to submit your comments anonymously. If you choose to remain anonymous, your comments will be made public and attributed to an anonymous individual. No other information about you will be made publicly available.
Comments will remain posted on the Canada Gazette website for at least 10 years.
Please note that public email is not secure, if the attachment you wish to send contains sensitive information, please contact the departmental email to discuss ways in which you can transmit sensitive information.
Privacy notice
The information you provide is collected under the authority of the Financial Administration Act, the Department of Public Works and Government Services Act, the Canada–United States–Mexico Agreement Implementation Act,and applicable regulators’ enabling statutes for the purpose of collecting comments related to the proposed regulatory changes. Your comments and documents are collected for the purpose of increasing transparency in the regulatory process and making Government more accessible to Canadians.
Personal information submitted is collected, used, disclosed, retained, and protected from unauthorized persons and/or agencies pursuant to the provisions of the Privacy Act and the Privacy Regulations. Individual names that are submitted will not be posted online but will be kept for contact if needed. The names of organizations that submit comments will be posted online.
Submitted information, including personal information, will be accessible to Public Services and Procurement Canada, who is responsible for the Canada Gazette webpage, and the federal institution managing the proposed regulatory change.
You have the right of access to and correction of your personal information. To seek access or correction of your personal information, contact the Access to Information and Privacy (ATIP) Office of the federal institution managing the proposed regulatory change.
You have the right to file a complaint to the Privacy Commission of Canada regarding any federal institution’s handling of your personal information.
The personal information provided is included in Personal Information Bank PSU 938 Outreach Activities. Individuals requesting access to their personal information under the Privacy Act should submit their request to the appropriate regulator with sufficient information for that federal institution to retrieve their personal information. For individuals who choose to submit comments anonymously, requests for their information may not be reasonably retrievable by the government institution.