Order Fixing August 15, 2019 as the Day on which Certain Provisions of that Act Come into Force: SI/2019-85

Canada Gazette, Part II, Volume 153, Number 17

Registration
SI/2019-85 August 21, 2019

AN ACT TO AMEND THE INDIAN ACT IN RESPONSE TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF QUEBEC DECISION IN DESCHENEAUX C. CANADA (PROCUREUR GÉNÉRAL)

Order Fixing August 15, 2019 as the Day on which Certain Provisions of that Act Come into Force

P.C. 2019-1163 August 7, 2019

Her Excellency the Governor General in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations and the Minister of Indigenous Services, pursuant to subsection 15(2) of An Act to amend the Indian Act in response to the Superior Court of Quebec decision in Descheneaux c. Canada (Procureur général), chapter 25 of the Statutes of Canada, 2017, fixes August 15, 2019 as the day on which sections 2.1, 3.1, 3.2 and 10.1 of that Act come into force.

EXPLANATORY NOTE

(This note is not part of the Order.)

Proposal

An Order in Council is required to bring sections 2.1, 3.1, 3.2 and 10.1 of An Act to amend the Indian Act in response to the Superior Court of Quebec decision in Descheneaux c. Canada (Procureur général) into force on August 15, 2019.

Objective

Enacting section 2.1, 3.1, 3.2 and 10.1 of An Act to amend the Indian Act in response to the Superior Court of Quebec decision in Descheneaux c. Canada (Procureur général) (Bill S-3) will remove the 1951 cut-off date under sub-paragraph 6(1)(c.1)(iv) of the Indian Act, resulting in the elimination of all sex-based inequities in its registration provisions. The removal of the 1951 cut-off will effectively extend entitlement to Indian status, under subsection 6(1) of the Indian Act, to descendants of women who lost status due to marriage going back to 1869.

Background

In August 2015, a decision was rendered in the Descheneaux case by the Superior Court of Quebec which declared key provisions of the Indian Act inoperative, because they unjustifiably violated equality rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms by perpetuating sex-based inequities in eligibility for Indian registration between descendants of the male and female lines. The Descheneaux decision highlighted residual sex-based inequities in Indian registration carried forward following the 1985 and 2011 amendments to the Indian Act. It also brought to light the long-standing and unaddressed broader issues relating to Indian registration, band membership and First Nations citizenship.

The Superior Court of Quebec suspended its decision until February 3, 2017, to allow Parliament to make the necessary changes to the Act. This period was subsequently extended to December 22, 2017.

Bill S-3 was introduced in direct response to the Descheneaux decision. The legislative amendments brought forward by Bill S-3 eliminated the sex-based inequities identified by the court in the Descheneaux case as well as other sex-based inequities in registration. Bill S-3 received royal assent on December 12, 2017.

Bill S-3 addresses sex-based inequities in the Indian registration provisions of the Indian Act for the following situations:

Bill S-3 also includes the requirement for the Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations to report to Parliament on the collaborative process on broader issues related to Indian registration, band membership and First Nations citizenship, and on the implementation of the bill.

The Minister is required to report to Parliament on the

The Bill also includes provisions that will remove the 1951 cut-off, which are to come into force once consultations with First Nations are completed. From June 12, 2018, to March 31, 2019, individuals from 442 First Nation communities were consulted and provided with the opportunity to share their input on the best way to implement these changes. Bringing this proposal forward now to seek an Order in Council is consistent with what was heard during the consultation process and with the recommendations made by the Minister’s Special Representative, Claudette Dumont-Smith.

Once the 1951 cut-off is removed from the Indian Act, all descendants born prior to April 17, 1985 (or of a marriage prior to that date), of women who were removed from band lists or not considered Indians because of their marriage to a non-Indian man will be entitled to 6(1) status. This will include circumstances prior to 1951 and in fact, will remedy inequities back to the 1869 Gradual Enfranchisement Act.

Bill S-3, except for the provisions related to the removal of the 1951 cut-off, came into force on December 22, 2017. The purpose of this Order in Council is to bring into force the remaining section of Bill S-3 that will remove the 1951 cut-off from the Indian Act registration provisions.

Implications

According to independent demographic assessments, it is possible that, upon the removal of the 1951 cut-off, between 270 000 and 450 000 individuals could become eligible to be registered as a Status Indian under the Indian Act. This broad range reflects the uncertainty around the number of people who will become eligible and who will register as a result of the amendments. Furthermore, because Indian registration is a voluntary act, any increase in the registered population will depend on the number of individuals who choose to apply and are able to prove entitlement.

Consultation

As per An Act to amend the Indian Act in response to the Superior Court of Quebec decision in Descheneaux c. Canada (Procureur général), the Minister had the obligation to hold consultations on a number of issues related to Indian registration. These consultations were officially launched on June 12, 2018, under the Collaborative Process on Indian registration, band membership and First Nation citizenship. From June 12, 2018, to March 31, 2019, a total of 14 103 individuals participated in the Collaborative Process and were consulted on the three consultation streams:

The input received as part of the Collaborative Process has established that First Nations support Indigenous women’s right to Indian registration through the removal of the 1951 cut-off. It has also made clear that First Nations: (1) are preoccupied by the financial sustainability of programs and services that could be impacted by an increase in the registered Indian population; and (2) require additional time to fully assess the impacts of the removal of the 1951 cut-off on their communities and identify the best means to mitigate the impacts. The implementation plan adopted by the Government of Canada addresses these concerns by ensuring proper funding levels for programs directly related to Indian registration and continued engagement with First Nations on impacts of the removal of the 1951 cut-off.

Departmental contact

Christine Hall
Acting Executive Director
New Service Offerings
Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada
Ottawa, Ontario
Telephone: 604‑362‑2863
Email: christine.hall@canada.ca